<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Who Asked Me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kiltze.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Political Commentary from an independant perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:26:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Following Utah Persons And Businesses Financially Supported Proposition 8: by BLDPS</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/the-following-people-and-businesses-financially-supported-proposition-8/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>BLDPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=125#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the list. I will be sure to support these businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the list. I will be sure to support these businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Just Dont Get It by kiltze</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2009/07/26/i-just-dont-get-it/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>kiltze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-195</guid>
		<description>The use of force was never in question by anyone but Eric E.  I for one do think it was very appropriate given the fact that drunk people can be unpredictable.  The kiss-ins are taking place off of church property on the adjacent sidewalks.  They are protesting what they call unfairness as the church allows straight people to kiss on the plaza.  My point is that the church can be as unfair as they want on their own private property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of force was never in question by anyone but Eric E.  I for one do think it was very appropriate given the fact that drunk people can be unpredictable.  The kiss-ins are taking place off of church property on the adjacent sidewalks.  They are protesting what they call unfairness as the church allows straight people to kiss on the plaza.  My point is that the church can be as unfair as they want on their own private property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Just Dont Get It by C.</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2009/07/26/i-just-dont-get-it/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Bearing in mind that this post is the first I&#039;m hearing of this whole situation, I would say that yes, the church had the right to ask the two men to leave and upon refusal had the right to restrain them until police could remove them.

However, just based on the comment thread you posted, I&#039;d need more details, but I would say there might be cause for excessive force. Just on its face, six sober men against two drunk men is questionable -- and no, I don&#039;t think just because &quot;they wouldn&#039;t leave!&quot; justifies beatings, and I REALLY don&#039;t think it justifies shootings, but I think I agree with Eric E. that that&#039;s an entirely different discussion.

As for whether or not the &quot;kiss-ins&quot; are approrpiate...what exactly are those? Are they regular, sign-holding protests (now with 90 percent more kissing) off of the church property? Are they people going onto the property, kissing and leaving (or not leaving until police are called)? Are people protesting the force that was used to detain the men or the fact that they were detained at all? Apparently, I&#039;ll have to look it up. 

A protest against the level of force (if it truly was severe) I can understand, but I would tend to agree that a protest about the detention seems ill-advised to me. But then, I never bought the &quot;any attention is good attention&quot; line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bearing in mind that this post is the first I&#8217;m hearing of this whole situation, I would say that yes, the church had the right to ask the two men to leave and upon refusal had the right to restrain them until police could remove them.</p>
<p>However, just based on the comment thread you posted, I&#8217;d need more details, but I would say there might be cause for excessive force. Just on its face, six sober men against two drunk men is questionable &#8212; and no, I don&#8217;t think just because &#8220;they wouldn&#8217;t leave!&#8221; justifies beatings, and I REALLY don&#8217;t think it justifies shootings, but I think I agree with Eric E. that that&#8217;s an entirely different discussion.</p>
<p>As for whether or not the &#8220;kiss-ins&#8221; are approrpiate&#8230;what exactly are those? Are they regular, sign-holding protests (now with 90 percent more kissing) off of the church property? Are they people going onto the property, kissing and leaving (or not leaving until police are called)? Are people protesting the force that was used to detain the men or the fact that they were detained at all? Apparently, I&#8217;ll have to look it up. </p>
<p>A protest against the level of force (if it truly was severe) I can understand, but I would tend to agree that a protest about the detention seems ill-advised to me. But then, I never bought the &#8220;any attention is good attention&#8221; line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays!  Ok, I Couldn&#8217;t Think Of A Witty Title For This Post So I Decided To Use An Easy One&#8230; by Pop</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/happy-holidays-ok-i-couldnt-think-of-a-witty-title-for-this-post-so-i-decided-to-use-an-easy-one/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Right on BBB.  Unions stymie productivity.  Unions have too much control.  Unions should assure safe working conditions and fair tratment of employees but should stay out of management decisions.  Affirmative Action becomes reverse discrimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on BBB.  Unions stymie productivity.  Unions have too much control.  Unions should assure safe working conditions and fair tratment of employees but should stay out of management decisions.  Affirmative Action becomes reverse discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays!  Ok, I Couldn&#8217;t Think Of A Witty Title For This Post So I Decided To Use An Easy One&#8230; by BBB</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/happy-holidays-ok-i-couldnt-think-of-a-witty-title-for-this-post-so-i-decided-to-use-an-easy-one/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>BBB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I ..concur, although it is hard to justify bailing out the  ‘Big 3’. UAW members are making $70hr and getting healthcare for life. The idea of unions is not what Joe Hill and others had envisioned, I am sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ..concur, although it is hard to justify bailing out the  ‘Big 3’. UAW members are making $70hr and getting healthcare for life. The idea of unions is not what Joe Hill and others had envisioned, I am sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays!  Ok, I Couldn&#8217;t Think Of A Witty Title For This Post So I Decided To Use An Easy One&#8230; by Pop</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/happy-holidays-ok-i-couldnt-think-of-a-witty-title-for-this-post-so-i-decided-to-use-an-easy-one/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-188</guid>
		<description>When you&#039;re right you&#039;re right.  Eric, you&#039;re right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re right you&#8217;re right.  Eric, you&#8217;re right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays!  Ok, I Couldn&#8217;t Think Of A Witty Title For This Post So I Decided To Use An Easy One&#8230; by Misty Fowler</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/happy-holidays-ok-i-couldnt-think-of-a-witty-title-for-this-post-so-i-decided-to-use-an-easy-one/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Misty Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Not that you&#039;re angry, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that you&#8217;re angry, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here Is What Would Happen If Gays Were Allowed To Marry: by C.</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/here-is-what-would-happen-if-gays-were-allowed-to-marry/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=130#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I love this graph. I really hate it when people are all &quot;Oh! If the gays are allowed to marry, then straight marriages will be in danger!!!&quot;

By the way, if you haven&#039;t seen Bill Maher&#039;s movie &quot;Religulous,&quot; I would highly recommend it. A preview is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Gxc0XEoQpQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this graph. I really hate it when people are all &#8220;Oh! If the gays are allowed to marry, then straight marriages will be in danger!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>By the way, if you haven&#8217;t seen Bill Maher&#8217;s movie &#8220;Religulous,&#8221; I would highly recommend it. A preview is here:</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2009/07/26/i-just-dont-get-it/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/-Gxc0XEoQpQ/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OK CNN, Seriously, I Mean Seriously&#8230; by Pop</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/ok-cnn-seriously-i-mean-seriously/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I guess advertising has blinders.  The allmighty buck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess advertising has blinders.  The allmighty buck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Following Utah Persons And Businesses Financially Supported Proposition 8: by The Following Persons And Businesses Financially Supported Proposition 8: &#124; carpentershoes.com</title>
		<link>http://kiltze.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/the-following-people-and-businesses-financially-supported-proposition-8/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>The Following Persons And Businesses Financially Supported Proposition 8: &#124; carpentershoes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiltze.wordpress.com/?p=125#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
